Clasicismo y génesis disciplinar antropológica: el caso de Julio Caro Baroja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/rdtp.1996.v51.i1.450Abstract
In his 1965 article on the Renaissance foundations of anthropology, John Rowe defined the discipline as, basically, the legitímate identification of differences among societies, and posited that anthropology emerged when scholars of the Renaissance idealized the societies of Antiquity and criticized their own ethnocentrism. By analyzing the implications of the argument in the history of the discipline in the l6th through the 20th centuries, the autor maintains that Julio Caro Baroja's career epitomizes that history, partly because of his education as an historian of Antiquity and because os his self-definition as both a historian and an anthroplogist.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1996 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.