Multicultural Geography versus Multicultural Genealogy: Ancient Distinctions with Contemporary Impacts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/rdtp.1996.v51.i1.333Abstract
This paper applies the concept of ancient commonplaces developed by Julio Caro Baroja to the study of nature-nurture concepts as they are employed in thinking about ethnicity. Centering on a comparison of the racialized notions of ethnicity prevalent in the United States and the regionalized concepts of ethnicity that are now hegemonic in Spain, it argues that a much deeper history of the concepts that underlie arguments about ethnicity is necessary for a meaningful anthropological approach to the subject. The essay stresses the need to examine these concepts against the field of the movement of concepts and ideas from the apex of a society to its base and viceversa in historical and spatial context by re-considering the value of the Great Tradition-Little Tradition models of analysis created in the 1950s.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1996 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.







